Thursday, October 30, 2014

Writing Multiple Genres


Writing Multiple Genres

 

Romano—“Multigenre Stirrings”

Creating Flow: Pulling It All Together

Styslinger—“Mutligenre-Multigendered Research Papers”

Biltz—“Teaching Literature Through Multigenre Paper: An Alternative to the Analytical Essay”

Wilhelm, Smith, and Fredicksen—Get It Done!

 

SAY:

 
            I find it very interesting that we are reading about multigenre pieces this week because the class I am observing is working with them right now.  I have looked through multiple projects that have been turned in, and I have become very intrigued by them.  I was very happy when I started my reading for this week because I have wanted to learn more about multigenre projects ever since I have seen them in my internship.  After reading this week’s articles and Get It Done, I feel much more educated about multigenre projects, and how significant their role in the English Classroom can be. 

            In Romano’s article, “Multigenre Stirrings,” gives a great overview of multigenre projects/papers and how they work.  Though I have seen extensive examples in my internship classroom, I like the examples in this article because of the diversity given.  Though I do not exactly like that he only put in college student examples, I do not let it cloud my judgment too much because I have seen so many successful projects come to life in my internship.  Also, I feel like I will use this reading again in my classroom to show students samples of multigenre entries. 

            My favorite part about Romano’s reading, aside from the multiple examples given, is the routine of making this work (starting on page 27).  Because I am such a concrete thinker, I like to see how things actually work in the classroom.  The routine given by Romano makes the Multigenre project feel much more accomplishable.  On day one, the teacher is share an encyclopedia entry and a poem about the text at hand to get students thinking about multiple writing styles. You are then supposed to engage in a large class discussion about how these multiple genres work together.  On day two, share an entire Multigenre paper with the class.  This is where the project is essentially introduced, and engage in a class discussion about how everything relates together (27).  On day three, let students choose the topic of their Multigenre project, and share topics that can be written about.  Let students talk together and discuss different ideas.  On day four, students need to submit their chosen work.  They will have had a day to make the decision.  Again, students will immerse into small groups to discuss everything.  On day five, students will actually begin writing (28). I really like this approach because everyday frontloads the next day.  By this schedule, students should not feel overwhelmed.  I like this schedule because it shows how doable this can really be in the classroom.     

            Next article I read, “Creating Flow,” was a great read after learning all of the basics in Romano’s text.  In “Creating Flow,” it becomes apparent that it is important to let students make the creative decisions in the project.  My limiting them too much, the process will be pointless, be letting students choose their own modes of genre, they are gaining much more insight.  Essentially, they have to feel out their own “flow.”  My favorite quote from this article is, “It is best if you let them think the problem through on their own before they rely on others” (97).  Essentially, for students to really learn through this project, they have to be able to make the creative decisions so that they can work through textual problems on their own. 

            In Styslinger’s article, I feel much more comfortable with actually immersing high school students with multigenre projects.  As I said before, Romano uses college examples, but Styslinger makes us feel like this is actually accomplishable with high school students.  Styslinger’s article gives a lot of great insight about how we can still immerse students with reading and writing without asking them to only focus on the 5 paragraph essay.  Even though a lot of the same skills may be applied to both forms of writing, the multigenre projects shows how the needed writing skills can work with so many different forms of writing.  Also, students will not feel forced into writing one specific way.  It becomes much more about form than formula because students are able to apply what they know about writing across multiple genres (54).   Along with this article being very informative, I think it also helps that it was written by Styslinger.  Because we all know her, it makes multigenre projects feel much more feasible because I know she would be telling us the same thing if she were teaching this course.  As weird as it sounds, it just feels much more factual than theoretical.

            My favorite reading for today was “Teaching Literature Through the Multigenre Paper” because it shows how multigenre projects explicitly work in the classroom.  She outlines some of the important goals that are met while implementing the multigenre project, and she explains how it works with her curriculum.  Additionally, she includes a list of purposes and state standards that are met by implementing this project.  Furthermore, the examples of how to implement multigenre projects with specific texts was very helpful. I will definitely use this resources again in the future.  This reading made me want to implement the multigenre project into my classroom as soon as possible. 

            Though the articles do a great job of explaining Multigenre projects, Get It Done gives a great deal of insight on writing and analyzing informational texts.  Though I feel like informational texts usually have the negative reception by teachers and students.  This book addresses that right off the bat by implying that nonfiction is a better term to use, so that students (and probably teachers) do not go into each lesson kicking and screaming.  This book shows how studying and writing informational texts can be treated just like other engagements.  One of my favorite parts about this books is the 5 Stages of Composing.  Planning, practicing, transferring, first drafts, and final drafts are all intricate steps to the formal writing process.  Even though some of these stages cannot be applied to all forms of writing, it is still a good idea to familiarize students with them.

            Additionally, this book gives a lot of great insight on the fundamental writing styles in a way that makes them seem a lot less traditional.  Some of these forms include: cause and effect, summarizing, and compare and contrast.  Instead of only engaging in these forms of writing through essays, Get It Done gives us more creative ways of implementing these strategies into the classroom.  Therefore, they can be transferred into the multigenre project. 

            Altogether, I think that this week’s readings are my favorite so far.  Because I have seen hands on examples of multigenre projects in my internship, I feel like these readings have answered a lot of my questions.  Additionally, these readings really illuminate the practicality of implementing multigenre projects into my future classroom.  This will be a much more fun and insightful way of bonding reading with writing without turning to the traditional 5 paragraph essay.  All in all, I really enjoyed the reading for this week. 

 

DO:

 My "do" for  this week can be found here: 
https://sites.google.com/site/saydodocuments/

Please look in the folder labeled "Say/Do Oct 30 2014."  It is an artifact from my internship.  This is the handout she gives her students about the Multigenre project they are required to do. 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment